Belvedere City Manager’s Blog

Entries from October 2009

Deer Committee Findings

October 19, 2009 · Leave a Comment

The Deer Committee findings and recommendations will be presented at the November 9, 2009 City Council Meeting.  Black-tailed deer remain a common sight in Belvedere, particularly on the Island.  The deer feed on a variety of plants, traverse well-worn paths, and bed in pockets of dense vegetation.  In early 2009, the City of Belvedere established a Deer Committee to review the issues.

The Deer Committee held seven public meetings from February to September of 2009. All meetings were noticed and public.  Audio recordings of all of the meetings were made available the following morning on the City’s Podcast page and are still available today.   A community-wide questionnaire was sent out to gauge local concern on the issue. The questionnaire had an impressive 50 percent response rate. Results showed the majority of respondents resided on the Island, and wished for more efforts toward deer population control.  Concerns ranged from yard damage to fear of personal injury.  A City Deer Webpage will be developed (in progress) that will house all deer information for the City (packets, meeting agendas, audio links, resources etc.).

The findings of the Deer Committee represent months of effort by more than 20 people holding public meetings, investigating, researching, analyzing, and learning about a controversial topic and potential solutions that proved far more elusive than originally thought. The recommendations represent well-thought out conclusions on a complicated issue.  Early on, representatives from the State Department of Fish and Game (DFG) were adamant that the deer were a State resource that could not be proactively addressed without the advice and consent of DFG.  DFG identified the four alternatives:  Relocation, Sterilization, Depredation, and Education.  DFG indicated that “relocation” efforts were no longer supported by DFG and could not be considered as a viable alternative. Further, DFG advised that “sterilization” programs had proven unreliable and would require extensive environmental review before they could be considered by DFG. Depredation or “hunting” was an option, but because of the urbanized area, DFG would still require extensive environmental review. Finally, DFG indicated that prior to issuing any individual property owner a depredation permit, the property owner must use any and all measures available to deter the deer (landscaping changes, fencing, warning devices, etc.) and if these measures are unsuccessful, the property owner then must identify the exact deer causing the damage. DFG would then issue the permit for depredation only for that deer and only with the approval of the local regulatory agency with respect to weapon laws.

Ultimately, the committee findings showed the most appropriate approach to the City’s deer situation is to provide more extensive education to the community.  Deer control methods such as landscaping with deer-resistant plants, repellents, low-impact fencing will need to be embraced community-wide for the most effective results.  It remains a violation of State and local laws to feed deer (Marin County Ordinance 8.04.226 and California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 251.3).  With respect to health concerns, in California, the tick species (Ixodes pacificus) that is the host of Lyme Disease is predominately a parasite of rodents, lizards, and birds – not deer.

September to December is the “rutting” or mating season for deer.  This is the time when mature bucks increase their displays of dominance.  April to June is the birthing season.  Does are known to be more aggressive toward perceived threats against their young during this period.  It is always advisable to avoid contact with deer – especially during these times of the year.

If you need immediate assistance with a deer-related problem, contact the Belvedere Police Department (435-3266) and/or the Marin Humane Society (883-4621).  You can also report deer incidents to the City directly at 435-3838.


Categories: Animal Control · Deer Committee and Activities

Sacramento “Borrows” Local Funds

October 19, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Fall is here and in the 2009 City Newsletter you will find articles on projects underway, some highlights of upcoming community events, and a synopsis of the City’s finances.  As  you know, the City prides itself on a history of self-reliance and believes this to be fundamental to good financial stewardship.  The City does not rely heavily on any Federal, State, or other non-local revenue source in the provision of services to the community.

Unfortunately, the State does not share the same sentiment and has balanced its budget with revenues dedicated to local government services.  The State’s recent budget adoption has resulted in the taking of huge amounts of money belonging to the CIty of Belvedere and hundreds of other cities, counties, special districts, and schools across California.  This “borrowing” of local funds will have a significant negative impact on the ability of local government to deliver its services.

Belvedere will lose roughly 8% or $300,000 of its general fund revenues from local property taxes.  Property taxes are used to provide a wide variety of local services including public safety, parks and facilities maintenance, capital projects, and the annual subsidy for fire services.  For more details, read the Fall 2009 City Newsletter coming to mailboxes this week…or the digital version online at:

http://www.cityofbelvedere.org/pdf/Fall_2009_Newsletter.pdf

Categories: City Budget · Finance

Appropriate Colors and Materials

October 15, 2009 · Leave a Comment

If you live in Belvedere and have thought about remodeling or doing improvements on your property there is no doubt that you are aware of the City’s Architectural & Environmental Design Review Ordinance.  This Ordinance has been a fixture in Belvedere since the early 1970’s.  Over the years, it has been tweaked, revised, overhauled, and hopefully improved.  Of course, it’s all a matter of perspective.
Some changes shifted review and discretion solely to the Planning Commission and other changes shifted review and authority to staff.  At the end of the day, the goal is to provide as smooth a process as possible.  One of the recent areas of change was the adoption of an “Appropriate Colors and Materials” Policy.  This Policy was developed to give limited authority to staff that could be applied to administrative design applications.  Colors preferred by an applicant that are outside of this limit of authority are not discouraged; instead, they remain soley within the purview of the Planning Commission.
Colors...

Colors...

If you live in Belvedere and have thought about remodeling or doing improvements on your property there is no doubt that you are aware of the City’s Architectural & Environmental Design Review Ordinance.  This Ordinance has been a fixture in Belvedere since the early 1970’s.  Over the years, it has been tweaked, revised, overhauled, and hopefully improved.  Of course, it’s all a matter of perspective.
Over the years, some of the changes in the Ordinance elevated review and discretion to the Planning Commission and other changes granted review and authority to staff.  At the end of the day, the goal remained to provide as smooth a process as possible for the applicant and the community.
Recently, the City Council and Planning Commission sought to make it possible for staff level approval of colors and materials.   Exterior colors and materials can be extremely controversial and create neighborhood discord.  As a result, staff level approvals needed to be conservative; particularly with respect to colors and materials.  To facilitate this, the Commission and Council adopted an “Appropriate Colors and Materials” Policy – Administrative Policy.  This Policy was developed to give limited authority to staff that could be applied to administrative design applications.  Colors preferred by an applicant that are outside of this limit of authority are not discouraged; instead, they remain soley within the purview of the Planning Commission.  Any decision made by staff could be appealed to the Planning Commission either by the applicant or another interested party.
With respect to colors and materials, some of the specified purposes of the Design Review Ordinance are:

  • “…to discourage the development of individual buildings which will dominate the Cityscape or attract attention to themselves through color, mass, or inappropriate architectural expression…”
  • “…to encourage the highest quality of architectural design, the use of natural materials…”
When evaluating colors and materials, findings required include:
  • “…building design should incorporate materials and colors that minimize the structures’ visual impact, that blend with the existing land form and vegetative color, that relate to and fit in with the structures in the neighborhood, and that do not attract attention to the structures themselves…”
  • “…materials which blend easily with the landscape, such as natural wood shingles and siding are preferred….”
  • “…soft and muted colors in the earth tone and wood tone range are preferred and generally should predominate…”
  • “…other colors and materials are acceptable only if the Planning Commission determines they are appropriate for the building setting, and are compatible with those of other buildings in the vicinity…”
The Policy provides guidelines for applicants seeking Administrative Review of their applications.  For those applicants seeking colors and/or materials outside of the parameters of the Policy, the option for review remains at the Planning Commission.  Such applications are not discouraged.
It is important to note however, that when presenting applications to the Planning Commission staff is required to assess the application’s consistency with the Design Review Ordinance.  If the colors and materials requested do not conform to the findings within the Design Review Ordinance (some listed above), staff must advise the Commission in the form of a recommendation.  It is solely within the Commission’s discretion to approve other colors and materials outside the acceptable range if the Commission determines they are “…appropriate for the building setting and are compatible with those of other buildings in the vicinity…”
For more information on the Policy and/or the City’s Design Review Ordinance, contact the City’s Planning Department at 435-3838.

Categories: General City Government · Planning